The sentence circled in red makes more sense if the letters “ly” are added to the word “previous”. Then again, it could use a bit of a re-write.
Typo spotted by Thomas on cnn.com on November 11, 2005.
Related posts:
- missing a verb from theregister.co.uk, where the word “are” is missing from the...
- missing the word “to” .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { }...
- more unnecessary apostrophes/missing hyphen What first caught my eye is the unnecessary apostrophes used...



